The "Lost" List
by Gary Harryman
Many people think circumcision removes nothing more than a little extra skin.
However, the fact of the matter is that circumcision removes several
critical components of male sexual anatomy.This list enumerates
everything currently known to be lost when one is circumcised. Included are
notes on whether these losses can or cannot be amended by foreskin restoration.
The information contained in this list may be upsetting to some,
but we feel it is important and necessary for those considering
restoration to understand as fully as possible the
anatomy/biology/neurology of what has been removed and/or destroyed.
It should be pointed out that circumcisions performed in North
America may be more severe than those done elsewhere. In the United
States, most hospital circumcisions are done to the Bris Periah
standard of removing every ounce of foreskin and, in a large percentage
of cases, some shaft skin.
Although several of the items in this list are not restorable, there
are many significant gains to be realized by restoring one's foreskin.
For information on these gains, please see the
Benefits page.
[The list is also available in
Turkish and
Romanian,
without the references included, translated and hosted by the
Circumcision Information and Resource Pages.]
Please note that although circumcision and foreskin restoration involve issues
of physical health and well-being, nothing appearing on this website
is intended to be medical advice. If you want medical advice or have
a medical problem, contact a doctor.
- Foreskin
-
The foreskin comprises roughly 50% (and sometimes more) of the mobile
skin system of the penis. If unfolded and spread out flat, the average
adult foreskin would measure about 15 square inches - the size of a
three-by-five index card. This highly specialized tissue normally
covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (also
called keratinization), and contaminants of all kinds.
Click here to view an
animated graphic illustrating foreskin mobility.
We refer to the process we undergo as foreskin restoration
but we don't actually grow new foreskins. What we do instead is to
extend the remaining skin on the shaft of the penis. The non-surgical
techniques we use induce the skin to grow additional cells, and over a
period of time the shaft skin will gradually extend to cover the glans.
The extended skin looks and behaves and functions much like a natural
foreskin.
[Sources: 1. M. M. Lander, "The Human Prepuce," in G. C.
Denniston and M. F. Milos, eds.,
Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy (New York: Plenum Press, 1997), 79-81.
2. M. Davenport,
"Problems with the
Penis and Prepuce: Natural History of the Foreskin," British Medical Journal
312 (1996): 299-301.]
- Frenar Band, or Ridged Band
-
The frenar band is a group of soft ridges near the junction of the inner and outer
foreskin. This region is the primary erogenous zone of the intact male body. Loss of
this delicate belt of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue reduces the
fullness and intensity of sexual response.
There is no known method of restoring the frenar band.
[Source: Taylor, J. R. et al., "
The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision,"
British Journal of Urology 77 (1996): 291-295.]
- Gliding Action
-
The foreskin's gliding action is a hallmark feature of the normal, natural, intact
penis. This non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of its own shaft skin
facilitates smooth, comfortable, pleasurable intercourse for both partners. Without
this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way
valve, making artificial lubricants necessary for comfortable intercourse.
The return of this natural gliding action is one of the primary benefits of
foreskin restoration. In many cases, wives of restoring men were initially doubtful
about restoration but came to value it highly when their husbands had grown enough
new skin to effect greater levels of comfort and pleasure during intercourse.
[Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "
The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living
(Winter 1997): 36-45.]
- Meissner's Corpuscles
-
Circumcision removes the most important sensory component of the foreskin - thousands
of coiled fine-touch receptors called Meissner's corpuscles. Also lost are branches of
the dorsal nerve, and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of
several types. Together these detect subtle changes in motion and temperature, as well
as fine gradations in texture.
There is no known method of restoring Meissner's corpuscles or other specialized
sensory nerve cells. However, restoring and restored men almost universally experience
tremendous increases in sensitivity, in part because the highly sensitive nerve cells
in the glans are no longer buried under several layers of keratinized skin.
[Sources: 1. R. K. Winkelmann,
"The Erogenous Zones:
Their Nerve Supply and Its Significance," Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of
the Mayo Clinic 34 (1959): 39-47. 2. R. K. Winkelmann,
"The Cutaneous Innervation
of Human Newborn Prepuce," Journal of Investigative Dermatology 26 (1956): 53-67.]
- Frenulum
-
The frenulum is a highly erogenous V-shaped structure on the underside of the glans
that tethers the foreskin. During circumcision it is frequently either amputated with
the foreskin or severed, which destroys or diminishes its sexual and physiological
functions.
If the frenulum is amputated, there is no known method of replacing it. If only
a small portion of the frenulum is left, it is probably no longer functional as a
tethering structure. There is no known method of attaching it to a restored foreskin,
but some men have reported stretching the frenulum remnant as they stretched their foreskin.
[Sources: 1. Cold, C, Taylor, J,
"The
Prepuce," BJU International 83, Suppl. 1, (1999): 34-44. 2.
Kaplan, G.W.,
"
Complications of Circumcision," Urologic Clinics of North America
10, 1983.]
- Dartos Fascia
-
Circumcision removes approximately half of this temperature-sensitive smooth muscle
sheath which lies between the outer layer of skin and the corpus cavernosa.
There is no known method of restoring amputated portions of the dartos fascia.
However, the new skin may duplicate dartos fascia muscle tissue if it is present in
the remnant skin that is being stretched.
[Source: Netter, F.H.,
"
Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): Plates 234, 329, 338,
354, 355.]
- Immunological System
-
The soft mucosa (inner foreskin) contains its own immunological defense system which
produces plasma cells. These cells secrete immunoglobulin antibodies as well as
antibacterial and antiviral proteins, including the pathogen killing enzyme lysozyme.
Once removed with the foreskin, there is no known method of restoring this
immunological defense system.
[Sources: 1. A. Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report
of Two Cases Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969):
899-901. 2. P. J. Flower et al., "An Immunopathologic Study of the
Bovine Prepuce," Veterinary Pathology 20 (1983):189-202.]
- Lymphatic Vessels
-
The loss of these vessels due to circumcision reduces the lymph flow within that part
of the body's immune system.
While some lymphatic vessels remain, there is no known method of restoring those
that were removed during circumcision.
[Source: Netter, F.H.,
"
Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 379.]
- Estrogen Receptors
-
The presence of estrogen receptors within the foreskin has only recently been
discovered. Their purpose is not yet understood and needs further study.
There is no known method of restoring the foreskin's estrogen receptors.
[Source: R. Hausmann et al., "The Forensic Value of the Immunohistochemical Detection
of Oestrogen Receptors in Vaginal Epithelium," International Journal of Legal Medicine
109 (1996): 10-30.]
- Apocrine Glands
-
These glands of the inner foreskin produce pheromones - nature's powerful, silent,
invisible behavioral signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their
absence on human sexuality has never been studied.
There is no known method of restoring apocrine glands to the penis.
[Source: A.Ahmed and A. W. Jones, "Apocrine Cystadenoma: A Report of Two Cases
Occurring on the Prepuce," British Journal of Dermatology 81 (1969): 899-901.]
- Sebaceous Glands
-
The sebaceous glands may lubricate and moisturize the foreskin and glans,
which is normally a protected internal organ. Not all men have sebaceous glands on
their inner foreskin.
There is no known method of restoring sebaceous glands if they were present.
[Source: A. B. Hyman and M. H. Brownstein, "Tyson's Glands: Ectopic Sebaceous Glands
and Papillomatosis Penis," Archives of Dermatology 99 (1969): 31-37.]
- Langerhans Cells
-
These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system in the penis.
There is no known method of restoring Langerhans cells to the penis.
[Source: G. N. Weiss et al., "The Distribution and Density of Langerhans Cells in the
Human Prepuce: Site of a Diminished Immune Response?" Israel Journal of Medical
Sciences 29 (1993): 42-43.]
- Natural Glans Coloration
-
The natural coloration of the glans and inner foreskin (usually hidden and only
visible to others when sexually aroused) is considerably more intense than the
permanently exposed and keratinized coloration of a circumcised penis. The
socio-biological function of this visual stimulus has never been studied.
The glans ranges from pink to red to dark purple among intact men of Northern
European ancestry, and from pinkish to mahagony to dark brown among intact men of
Color. If circumcision is performed on an infant or young boy, the connective tissue
which protectively fuses the foreskin and glans together is ripped apart. This leaves
the glans raw and subject to infection, scarring, pitting, shrinkage, and eventual
discoloration. Over a period of years the glans becomes keratinized, adding additional
layers of tissue in order to adequately protect itself, which further contributes to
discoloration.
Many restoring men report dramatic changes in glans color and appearance, and
that these changes closely mirror the natural coloration and smooth, glossy appearance
of the glans seen in intact men.
[Source: P. M. Fleiss, MD, MPH, "
The Case Against Circumcision," Mothering: The Magazine of Natural Family Living
(Winter 1997): 36-45.]
- Length and Circumference
-
Circumcision removes some of the length and girth of the penis - its double-layered
wrapping of loose and usually overhanging foreskin is removed. A circumcised penis
is truncated and thinner than it would have been if left intact.
Many men have kept detailed records of their measurements before, during, and after
restoration. There is an increasing consensus that foreskin restoration enhances penile
length and circumference.
[Source: R. D. Talarico and J. E. Jasaitis, "Concealed Penis: A Complication of Neonatal
Circumcision," Journal of Urology 110 (1973): 732-733.]
- Blood Vessels
-
Several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal
artery, are removed in circumcision. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts
normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of
the penis and altering its development.
There is no known method of restoring arteries and vessels that were removed during
circumcision. However, many restoring men have noticed that the new skin is more richly
vascularized than the older skin of their penis. We have no medical explanation for this
phenomenon.
[Sources: 1. H. C. Bazett et al.,
"Depth, Distribution and
Probable Identification in the Prepuce of Sensory End-Organs Concerned in Sensations
of Temperature and Touch; Thermometric Conductivity," Archives of Neurology and
Psychiatry 27 (1932): 489-517. 2. Netter, F.H.,
"
Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plates 238, 239.]
- Dorsal Nerves
-
The terminal branch of the pudendal nerve connects to the skin of the penis, the
prepuce, the corpora cavernosa, and the glans. Destruction of these nerves is a rare
but devastating complication of circumcision. If cut during circumcision, the top
two-thirds of the penis will be almost completely without sensation.
There is no known method of restoring dorsal nerves.
[Sources: 1. Agur, A.M.R. ed.,
"
Grant's Atlas of Anatomy," Ninth Edition (Williams and Wilkins, 1991): 188-190.
2. Netter, F.H.,
"
Atlas of Human Anatomy," Second Edition (Novartis, 1997): plate 380, 387.]
- Other Losses
-
Circumcision performed during infancy disrupts the bonding process
between child and mother. There are indications that the innate sense of
trust in intimate human contact is inhibited or lost. It can also have
significant adverse effects on neurological development.Additionally, an infant's
self-confidence and hardiness is diminished by forcing the newborn
victim into a defensive psychological state of "learned helplessness" or "acquired
passivity" to cope with the excruciating pain which he can neither fight nor flee.
The trauma of this early pain lowers a circumcised boy's pain threshold below that
of intact boys and girls.
[Sources: 1. R. Goldman,
Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma (Boston: Vanguard Publications, 1997), 139-175.
2. A. Taddio et al.,
"
Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Responses during Vaccination in Boys,"
Lancet 345 (1995): 291-292.]
Every year some boys lose their entire penises from circumcision
accidents and infections. They are then "sexually reassigned" by castration and
transgender surgery, and are expected to live their lives as females.
[Sources: 1. J. P. Gearhart and J. A. Rock, "Total Ablation of the
Penis after Circumcision with Electrocautery: A Method of Management and Long-Term
Followup," Journal of Urology 142 (1989):799-801. 2. M. Diamond and
H. K. Sigmundson, "Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-Term Review and Clinical
Implications," Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 151 (1997): 298-304.]
Every year many boys in the United States and elsewhere lose their
lives as a result of circumcision - a fact that is routinely
ignored or obscured.
[Sources: 1. G. W. Kaplan,
."Complications of
Circumcision," Urologic Clinics of North America 10 (1983): 543-549. 2.
R. S. Thompson, "Routine Circumcision in the Newborn: An Opposing View,"
Journal of Family Practice 31 (1990): 189-196.]